U.N. calls U.S. deadbeat!

(From March 17, 2009)

Well now, I think I've seen it all. The U.N. is calling the U.S. a deadbeat, saying it cant do the work the U.S. wants it to, without another $1B in money.

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=44922

Now, forgive me here, but the Ban Ki Moon ACTUALLY use the word's "we" (referring to the U.N.) and "work" in the same sentence? Because if there's anything the U.N. doesn't do... it's WORK! Fraud, extortion, money laundering, prostitution - yes. Those are all things the U.N. does. But legitimate work? Not hardly.

In fact, the U.N. is quite the illegitimate child of humanitarian work around the world. Now to hear the leader of that little dog and pony show demand money from the U.S. like so many ungrateful beggars really quite irritates me. In fact, America is by FAR the biggest donor and supporter of the U.N.'s corruption around the world.

However, it's time the U.S. did something it should've done a long time ago, that being kick the U.N. out of America, cut off the taxpayers financial support to the most corrupt, ineffective, rediculous, sad excuse for a relevant world body in history. Besides, we have better things to do with our money - like keep it in our pockets and try to save our economy from the clutches of the government.

"I'm from the government - and I'm here to help you."

Obama's buddies at ACORN to be part of 2010 US Census.

(From March 17, 2009)

Ok, so the US Census.. no big deal, right? WRONG!

The census determines which states get how many House Reps in Congress. Now, the recent attempt to subvert the Constitution and give D.C.'s reps voting status in exchange for an extra rep for Utah not withstanding, why should an organization with a history of voter fraud be allowed to take part in determining how many people are in the country - especially given the importance it has on which states have how many votes.

Now it would be one thing if they just accidentally happened to register mickey mouse several times in states other than FL and CA. I mean, after all, he's a U.S. Citizen with voting rights.. right? Well not quite, but then trying to register the Dallas Cowboys? I'm sorry, but i think they can register themselves.

Now what are the odds of a 'non-political' political organization what just happens to have ties to a President (I mean he only WORKED for them) who was elected in a controversial election that seemed to be rife with voter fraud associated with the same organization he used to work for? Certainly its not tit-for-tat and quid-pro-quo, you scratch my back i'll scratch yours. And certainly this has nothing to do with the redistricting of Congressional seats which may hold the balance of power in Congress of for the next decade.

No, it certainly has nothing of the sort going on. I mean, after all, the emperor is wearing clothes, but only the wisest can see them. Here's a hint: Hes naked!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/17/lawmakers-concerned-role-acorn-census/

Obama trying to force Vets to pay for their own medical care! OUTRAGE!

(From March 17, 2009)

Ok, so here's the skinny: Obama wants to force private medical companies to pay for veteran's medical insurance. Yeah, I know, it's outrageous.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20090316/pl_usnw/the_american_legion_strongly_opposed_to_president_s_plan_to_charge_wounded_heroes_for_treatment

Don't believe me? There's the story. Read it for yourself.

So, despite all the moral, ethical and Constitutional issues surrounding it (like Obama cares about the Constitution), the fact is that it's completely inconsistent with what he's stated as his goals (or is it?).

Ok, so lets see, he's actually authorized to have a military, which includes soldiers. So unlike welfare and social security, etc... for which there is no Constitutional authority, he is legally able to spend money on the military. So now that he has the authority to send them into harms way, where they bleed and die for the flag - which by the way he refused to salute on the campaign trail - he also has the moral and ethical responsibility to care for them and provide healthcare for their injuries.

I mean, he certainly doesn't mind making employers pay for their employees healthcare and any injuries suffered on the job. Is there all of a sudden a double standard where what's good for the goose isn't sufficient for the gander? He's telling us that the government has a responsiblity to bail out private companies but not care for it's own soldiers? He want's auto manufacturers to increase their costs by millions in order to cave to the unions every demand for healthcare, etc... for its workers - but isn't willing to pay for injuries to his troops? He is the Commander-in-Chief after all... (Oh right, the unions contributed millions to his campaign and the military didn't...silly me.)

Lets put it another way: He want's to provide healthcare for millions of people on welfare who merely sit around on their butts doing nothing, while siphoning off our hard earned tax dollars, but doesn't want to provide healthcare for those who actually earn it by protecting our country and his posh lazy ass sitting in the White House. Right. Because that's ethical.

So while he's in the middle of talking about how government healthcare is the answer, he's busy trying to make government employees (who work under hazardous conditions) use their own private healthcare in order to save the government a few million. (Seems to me he could just cut out all those lazy bums who do nothing useful and take a check - oh right, that's his voting base... my bad). Or perhaps, that $700B we had to spend last year for buying toxic mortgage debt - of which NOT ONE bad mortgage has been bought yet - yeah, we could've just saved that to pay for military healthcare. Oh, then there was that little $1.3T spending package they forced through with less than 48hrs of study - but who's counting?

So why is he doing it? Here's the evil genius of his plan - and it IS insidious - by making military personnel use private healthcare, he will drive the costs of private insurance through the roof. That in turn will cause a groundswell of cries for cheaper insurance - supplied by the government. There you have it - Obama is selling out the troops in order to further his goal of mandatory governmental healthcare. Yeah, told you it was insidious.

But Obama has bigger things to deal with today - i.e. TWO St. Paddies Day parties at the White House!
http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0309/big_day_wednesday_36650cd8-6222-4f7d-9f10-ad7ecbd4a169.html


So here's the deal: I'm getting pretty sick and tired of this lying sack of shit and his ugly pug-faced bitch wife screwing over my country. I'm advocating his removal from office. Yes, you heard me, I'm calling for his removal from office - NOW! This deserves nothing less than impeachment. (Every single one of you that voted for him should feel like suckers - because you are!)

--------------------------

In an ironic twist - after ridiculing McCain for saying the fundamentals of our economy were strong during the campaign trail, AND spending two months crying CRISIS every chance he could - he's now saying how strong the fundamentals of the economy are. The man will say and do anything to get what he wants. In fact he's like the snot nosed brat in your class that you always wanted to pull into the bathroom, throw on the floor and punch in the face repeatedly.

http://dissentingjustice.blogspot.com/2009/03/fundamentals-of-economy-are-sound.html

AIG Bonus Fallout... Why what Obama's boys are saying isn't matching up.

(From March 17, 2009)

Ok, so first, Obama's Treasury Sec. Tim "Turbo Tax Cheat" Geithner created the AIG bailout. Then, they all feigned anger at the executive bonuses. Well that's all fine and dandy, but lets look at the real story.

The real story here is that Sen. Chris Dodd (D) is trying to undo the bonus protections that HE put in the bill in the first place!!!!

http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/dodd-cracks-aig---time/

Ok, now, I'm sure the fact that Dodd received more from AIG last year than any other Congressman or Senator is of no consequence right? What about the fact that Obama got the second most money from them? Transparency? I think not.

The fact is, Those two received WAY more money than anyone else.

Dodd - $103,100
Obama - $101,332
McCain - $59,499
H. Clinton - $35,965

(That's just the top 4)

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000123

Check that out for the full list.

Oh, and that money went almost 4-1 to the Democrats. So now they act all mad when AIG exec's get bonuses? No no. This is more like legalized extortion. After all, the mafia is legal when the government runs the mob. But God forbid if you speak out against them. I mean just look at Joe the Plumber and talk radio... bring on the IRS.

Mexican drug war spills over border while Sherrif Joe investigated for ENFORCING immigration law

(From March 12, 2009)

http://cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=44899
----------------------
Justice Dept. Investigates Arizona Sheriff for Enforcing Immigration Law
Thursday, March 12, 2009
By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer

(CNSNews.com) - The Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched an investigation of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office in Arizona following requests by congressional Democrats and allegations by liberal activists that the department has violated the civil rights of illegal aliens.

Reps. John Conyers (D-Mich.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), and Robert Scott (D-Va.) requested the investigation, and activists groups such as National Day Laborer Organizer Network and ACORN launched petition drives and rallies in support of the probe.

The investigation focuses on Sheriff Joe Arpaio and dozens of officers under his command who were trained through the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Agreements of Cooperation in Communities to Enhance Safety and Security (ACCESS), which partners federal and local law enforcement to enforce immigration laws. (The Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement division is known popularly as ICE.)

In a letter dated March 10, 2009, Loretta Smith, acting assistant attorney general at the DOJ, detailed what her department would be investigating:

"This is to inform you that the United States Department of Justice is commencing an investigation of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (''MCSO'') pursuant to the pattern or practice provisions of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994,42 U.S.C. §14141 ("Section 14141") and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968,42 U.S.C. § 3789d ("Safe Streets Act"), and pursuant to the prohibitions against national origin discrimination in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-7 ("Title Yr') and the Safe Streets Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)."

The letter continues: "The investigation will focus on alleged patterns or practices of discriminatory police practices and unconstitutional searches and seizures conducted by the MCSO, and on allegations of national origin discrimination, including failure to provide meaningful access to MCSO services for limited English proficient (LEP) individuals."

"In conducting the investigation, we will seek to determine whether there are violations of the above laws by the MCSO," the letter says.

Sheriff Arpaio's efforts to enforce immigration laws have been the focus of previous criticism, but Arpaio has defended his department and the results his ICE-trained officers have netted.

Concerning the DOJ’s investigation, Arpaio told CNSNews.com: “I will not back down. What I am doing is upholding the laws of the state of Arizona, and I will not be persuaded to turn my back on my oath of office as sheriff of this county.”

In an August 2008 press release, Arpaio's office detailed those results.

"While the Sheriff’s illegal immigration and human smuggling operations conducted on the streets and roadways here have netted nearly 2,300 arrests, another very successful effort to locate illegal aliens has been quietly happening inside Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s jails," the release said.

It continues: "Despite the growing criticism of the Sheriff’s illegal immigration fight by some valley politicians and activists, Sheriff Arpaio says 60 detention officers trained by ICE officials have conducted over 106,000 interviews and investigations of inmates booked into jail since April of 2007.

"In those 18 months, 16,000 inmates were determined to be illegal aliens. Either they have already been deported or will be deported after being tried and/or serving their sentences for crimes committed in the valley. The work being done be Arpaio’s detention staff is a likely contributor to the recent reduction in crime in the valley,” the press release added.

"That number of 16,000 represents a full one-third (1/3) of all inmates in the United States who have had holds placed on them after being identified by jail or prison officials as illegal aliens."

The press release goes on to say that 20 percent of inmates in the Maricopa County Jail are illegal aliens and that of those, 2,000 illegal aliens - 70 percent - were arrested for felony crimes.

Those felony crimes committed included the following: forgery, 12 percent; kidnapping, 10 percent; aggravated assault, 7 percent; driving under the influence, 7 percent; drug charges, 27 percent; robbery, 3 percent; murder, 3 percent; and theft, 4 percent.

The Democratic Congress members have also asked Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to launch an investigation into the training provided by ICE.
----------------------

So, lets see... Obama won't send troops to our border to protect Americans from a Mexican drug invasion, but he will let the Justice Department investigate one of the few Sheriff's that legitimately upholds Federal immigration law.

Is it any wonder ACORN is involved on behalf of the illegals? Let me guess, they want them to be given park benches in order to register them to vote in the next election. Apparently Mickey Mouse and the Dallas Cowboys aren't enough. Is anybody else infuriated by this blatant attempt to hijack our rights as citizens to have our elections free from outside interference?

Next time you see an ACORN "community organizer" go find a pack of rabid squirrels and say: "Sic Em!"